AIA Florida

Home | Log-In | Search | Contact Us

Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

A Chapter of the American Institute of Architects

Looking for an architect? Are you an architect? Are you a student?

 
Upcoming Events   Contract Documents
 
Continuing Education   JLI Training
 

Amendment 3

Governmental Affairs

Amendment 3

Understanding the proposed changes to Florida's property tax system and the potential implications for homeowners, local governments and the built environment.

What is Amendment 3?

Amendment 3 would amend the Florida Constitution and make significant changes to Florida's property tax system.

The proposal would increase the homestead exemption for non-school property taxes, reduce the annual assessment-growth cap for certain non-homestead properties, and establish a residency requirement for some new Florida residents.

If approved, the amendment would take effect January 1, 2027.

60%

Amendment 3 must be approved by at least 60% of voters to become part of the Florida Constitution.

What Would Change?

The proposal includes several significant changes to property taxation in Florida.

Current Exemption $50K

Current homestead exemption applicable to non-school property taxes.

Beginning in 2027 $150K

Proposed homestead exemption for non-school property taxes in 2027.

Beginning in 2028 $250K

Proposed exemption beginning in 2028, with inflation adjustments beginning in 2029.

The annual assessment-growth cap for qualifying non-homestead properties would also decrease from 10% to 5%.

Potential Property Tax Savings

What Could It Mean for Homeowners?

For qualifying homeowners, the increased exemption could provide meaningful property tax savings. Florida TaxWatch estimates that a home assessed above $250,000 could save approximately:

$1,035 Estimated savings in 2027
$2,085 Estimated savings in 2028

These estimates use the statewide average non-school property tax rate. Actual savings would vary by property and local tax rates.

Source: Florida TaxWatch

Visit Florida TaxWatch

What About Local Government Revenue?

The potential homeowner savings also represent property tax dollars that would no longer flow to local governments. This raises questions about how buildings, infrastructure and public improvements traditionally supported by this revenue would be funded.

01

Recurring Revenue

Property tax revenue is an important recurring funding source for Florida's cities and counties. Amendment 3 would not prohibit governments from spending property tax revenue on infrastructure; the issue is whether communities would have less revenue overall to divide among competing needs.

02

Capital Improvements

New public projects, maintenance of existing structures and other capital improvements require stable and substantial funding. Reduced recurring revenue could place additional pressure on capital improvement budgets.

03

Existing Infrastructure

Florida communities already own and operate significant inventories of public buildings and infrastructure that must be maintained, repaired, renovated and eventually replaced.

04

Population Growth

Growing communities will need new public facilities and infrastructure while simultaneously maintaining what they already have. Reducing a recurring revenue source does not eliminate those needs or their costs.

Impact on Florida's Built Environment

Local governments routinely balance competing needs when determining how limited public dollars should be invested.

If recurring revenue declines, projects could be delayed, reduced in scope or financed differently as communities balance available funding against growing infrastructure needs.

Constructing new public facilities
Repairing aging buildings
Improving roads and transportation
Upgrading stormwater systems
Maintaining existing infrastructure
Paying existing public debt

How Could Communities Respond?

If property tax revenue decreases while infrastructure, building and service needs remain, local governments may have to identify other ways to fund those responsibilities.

Depending on local circumstances and applicable law, possible responses could include:

Higher Millage Rates
New or Increased Assessments
Service & User Fees
Additional Borrowing
Delayed Capital Projects
Reductions in Other Programs

Commercial property owners, large landowners and owners of second homes could potentially face higher taxes or fees. Renters could also be affected if property owners pass increased costs along through higher rents.

Resilience & Recovery

Local Funding Matters During Disasters

Reliable local revenue is also important when communities face hurricanes, flooding, wildfires and other disasters. Federal and state assistance may cover some recovery expenses, but local governments can remain responsible for substantial costs.

Debris Removal
Road Clearance
Emergency Operations
Flood Mitigation
Public Facility Repairs
Infrastructure Recovery
Emergency Response
Resilience Improvements

Maintaining sufficient local financial capacity is particularly important in a state where resilient buildings and infrastructure are essential to protecting communities.

What Voters Should Consider

Amendment 3 could provide significant tax relief to qualifying homeowners and greater predictability for certain property owners.

At the same time, it would reduce recurring property tax revenue available to cities and counties responsible for maintaining Florida's communities without providing an alternative revenue source for those needs.

Voters may wish to consider both the potential individual property tax savings and how their community could address reduced revenue while continuing to fund buildings, infrastructure, maintenance, resilience and capital improvements.

 

©2026 AIA Florida.   Contact Us · Privacy Policy